in , , ,

You Stink! aka, Fallacies Attacking the Person

Man pointing his finger at the other guy: ID 130966660 © Fizkes | Dreamstime.com
Mad male colleagues have disagreement in office arguing on work issues, furious millennial employee point at coworker blaming for mistake or failure, businessman accuse partner disputing at workplace

[Originally published as Logic Lessons: Genetic Fallacy and Poisoning the Well]

I have a pair of fallacies for you where the person is attacked rather than allowing a discussion of the ideas to be presented on their own merits. This pair works well together, and sometimes the distinctions are blurry (even some of my sources disagree since the ad hominem can merge with the “red herring” distraction). Since I have been subjected to this kind of “reasoning” lately, I can draw from my own experiences.

But I have to be careful because I have been known to mix up the Genetic Fallacy and its close cousin, the Fallacy of Composition.

Advertisement Below:

First, the Poisoning the Well fallacy

This fallacy is committed by someone who wants to discredit a person and ignore whatever he or she is about to present — a preemptive strike if you will. The person it is directed toward looks bad before he even begins to speak.

When discussing creationism and showing the flaws in evolution, people have said that “Your Creationist sources are all disproved.” Also, my news sources in other articles have been rejected out of hand because they are by Christian organizations or Fox News. My references are not even examined by most of the critics, and they poison the well against anyone else who may have been considering checking them.

Meet its cousin, the Genetic Fallacy.

This says that something is true or untrue because of its source instead of its merit. It is a kind of red herring argument because the user seeks to distract from the points being raised.

Two points to make this more confusing: It is not always a fallacy to question the source of an argument or proposition, and sometimes the Genetic Fallacy is an ad hominem, but not always. To stay with the creationism example, I have had my arguments rejected simply because I am a creationist. Or, my statements have been rejected because I am a Christian.

Both Poisoning the Well and the Genetic Fallacy are often used as manipulations in an argument. Watch for them, and call “foul!” Because once these are appealed to, good reasoning, presentations, ideas, and logic are rejected. If something is untrue or invalid, it should be exposed for the error it contains instead of ridiculing the idea, its origin, or its presenter, capice? To me, this stinks of intellectual cowardice.

Advertisement Below:

Even if you cannot exactly identify if a fallacy is Poisoning the Well or the Genetic Fallacy, you will still be able to point out the fact that the other party is not exactly playing fair.

Now I have a bonus for you. Remember Norman the Paranoid Troll? (His response to me giving him that name was to call me “Norman” right back.) Take a look at this:

Your assignment: Spot the ad hominem, Poisoning the Well and Genetic Fallacies. Be forewarned, though. They blend.

Written by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Although raised in a United Methodist family where my father was a pastor, I was challenged in my high school years to examine why we believe the Bible and hold to our doctrines. Years later, I drifted from the faith but never fully abandoned it. After I recommitted my life to Jesus in 2010, I was led to establish Weblogs to discuss matters of doctrine, apologetics, and especially biblical creation science. This grew into the Piltdown Superman site. My primary goal is to help equip the church in defending the faith, especially the foundations in Genesis.

Advertisement Below:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Loading…

0
Advertisement Below:
Advertisement Below:
Portrait of Johannes Kepler on the left and photo of James Irwin on the Moon

It’s Hard Not to Recognize God’s Glory in the Heavens